Munch's The Scream Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Munch's The Scream - Essay Example The sky and the landscape stand in contrast to each other, depicting how these emotions are all present inside us, creating inner conflict and tension. The straight lines and dull brown and gray colors of the bridge are the only stable and uniform part of the painting. Yet even this bridge isn’t safe for it’s completely surrounded by the anxiety all around nature, gradually becoming a part of the chaotic feelings. For example, the red and golden light from the sky vividly reflects off of the railings showing how every place is touched by such fear and panic. The figure is almost as curvy as the lines of the landscape as if it is being sucked in by all the strong feelings and being absorbed by them. Also, the fact that the figure isn’t represented as either a male or female shows how these feelings are a part of all of us regardless of gender. The face is devoid of any hair or accessories, instead it is stripped down to its most basic form, a gray skull expressing the horror all around. The black lines of the clothing are melting into the bridge becoming a part of the environment, unable to escape. Munch has painted the figure at the forefront, almost walking off the bridge and towards the viewer. With the dark red and angry sky swirling above a cold, blue landscape, we can practically hear the agonizing scream.

Schleiermachers and Nietzsches Opposition to Immanuel Kant Essay

Schleiermachers and Nietzsches Opposition to Immanuel Kant - Essay Example This essay discusses that Kant assumes that man must possess a certain â€Å"goodwill† and that whatever happens, one must know that he â€Å"ought to do the inexpedient good† (278). However, based on the views of Schleiermacher and Nietzsche, the ideas of Kant somehow imply that all human beings are the same no matter what and that they share the same moral values and systems of morality. Kant’s contemporary, Friedrich Schleiermacher, expressed his opposition to Kant’s categorical imperative by declaring that the imperative cannot presume at all that it should apply uniformly to all human beings because of the â€Å"value of diversity or individuality even in the human sphere† (Forster). Therefore, for Schleiermacher, all humans cannot be subjected under one moral law because individuals are distinct from their societies as societies are distinct from each other. Moreover, although the categorical imperative implies a commitment to all humanity, Schleiermacher believes that it is not the individual but religion that must possess this duty towards humanity. Schleiermacher also rejects Kant’s otherworldly basis of religion and at the same time, the former emphasizes that â€Å"religion can no more be based on morality than on metaphysics or science† (Forster). Therefore, for Schleiermacher, the basis of religion, since it cannot seem to be ascertained, is not as important as its purpose in taking care of humanity. Unlike Kant, Schleiermacher further stressed out the importance of Jesus Christ and his life as a basis for his salvation.